Comparing the two technical aspects is not new, and here we are doing it for 2 tech stacks i.e. MobX and Redux. See, we believe each technical concept has its own significance, and its utilization depends upon the requirement of the project along with the comfort of a developer.
It will help in relating their performances on various parameters. As we know, both of them, MobX and Redux are well-known state management libraries of the present era. Do you know why we need a statement management library? If not, here you go:
If the developer has developed an application using ReactJS which is a component-based library, each component will maintain its own local state. Usually, the state of the application is maintained by the root component.
Being a developer or a technical person, you may know, various components will keep interacting with the state data at the allocated time. Also, they will change the data before reversing it to the server. Now, what happens?
The application comes out to be more complex and it further increases the difficulty level. Moreover, it may be possible that the state of the component becomes unpredictable, and debugging will also become lengthy.
The evolution of state management systems like MobX and Redux acted as a boon for the developers, and there is no need to make the process complex. The function of the state management system is to move the state out of the component as solely a testable unit.
Further, there is a method to synchronize the react components with the application state. Now the process will be light. Also, the debugging process will be frequent because now the data comes from a single source, unlike the traditional methods.
The difference between Redux and MobX is explained in the proceeding sections.