MobX vs Redux: Comparison - Which performs better in 2024?
MobX vs Redux: Comparison – Which Performs Better?
Mayank Patel
Dec 8, 2021
5 min read
Last updated Mar 6, 2024
Table of Contents
Brief of MobX and Redux
MobX Vs. Redux performance
The Primary Comparison Is Discussed Below
Share
Contact Us
Comparing the two technical aspects is not new, and here we are doing it for 2 tech stacks i.e. MobX and Redux. See, we believe each technical concept has its own significance, and its utilization depends upon the requirement of the project along with the comfort of a developer.
Before analyzing the difference between Redux and MobX, we should understand both concepts individually.
It will help in relating their performances on various parameters. As we know, both of them, MobX and Redux are well-known state management libraries of the present era. Do you know why we need a statement management library? If not, here you go:
If the developer has developed an application using ReactJS which is a component-based library, each component will maintain its own local state. Usually, the state of the application is maintained by the root component.
Being a developer or a technical person, you may know, various components will keep interacting with the state data at the allocated time. Also, they will change the data before reversing it to the server. Now, what happens?
The application comes out to be more complex and it further increases the difficulty level. Moreover, it may be possible that the state of the component becomes unpredictable, and debugging will also become lengthy.
The evolution of state management systems like MobX and Redux acted as a boon for the developers, and there is no need to make the process complex. The function of the state management system is to move the state out of the component as solely a testable unit.
Further, there is a method to synchronize the react components with the application state. Now the process will be light. Also, the debugging process will be frequent because now the data comes from a single source, unlike the traditional methods.
The difference between Redux and MobX is explained in the proceeding sections.
Brief of MobX and Redux:
Redux: Dan Abramov and Andrew Clark have found the statement management system in the year 2015. The definition of Redux is as a predictable state container for applications built using JavaScript.
Further, Redux follows the architecture of Facebook’s flux, and its functional concepts are based on the programming language Elm.
MobX: With the implementation of TFRP (Transparently applying Functional Reactive Programming), the intent of MobX is to make state management smooth, stable, and uncomplicated. Here, the library (Mobx) uses a single object tree to store the entire application.
The first parameter is Purity, for which we will analyze MobX Vs. Redux performance.
MobX: By using MobX, developers can update the states by overwriting the new rules. Thus, the library is impure. You may find its implementation easier but debugging, or maintenance may become challenging because of unpredictable outputs.
Redux: On the other hand, to store the states, Redux uses the stand-alone and immutable source of truth. It means developers will not be able to make changes like MobX because the states will be in read-only mode. Further, action will be invoked to overwrite a state in the case of Redux. Redux is pure because you get a state, action, and a returned new state.
Conclusion: The point goes to Redux.
MobX Vs. Redux - Boilerplate Code:
MobX: The library packs the least boilerplate, and its nature is implicit.
Redux: The main disadvantage of Redux is its sheer volume of boilerplate code, and it is majorly in the React applications.
Conclusion: Clearly, the point goes to MobX.
MobX Vs. Redux - Debugging:
Debugging is the most required parameter in order to check Mobx Vs. Redux performance.
MobX: By reading the above content, you must have experienced that MobX works on abstraction as a result of which, debugging becomes challenging. Moreover, the library does not have an efficient tool for testing and debugging.
Redux: As stated above, debugging is predictable when we work using Redux. Here a mechanism for synchronization is available that makes the process easy and debugging simple.
Conclusion: The point goes to Redux.
MobX Vs. Redux - The logic of Data Flow:
MobX: MobX is based on unidirectional data flow. But here, the update is done without action or event. Because of that, other views are also affected, and the output becomes unpredictable.
Redux: The concept of Redux also follows a strict unidirectional data flow. For any update, there is a need to invoke an action.
Conclusion: The point goes to Redux.
MobX Vs. Redux - Data Store:
MobX: In the case of MobX minimum of two stores are used in which one store has a UI state, and the other has a domain state. With two separate stores, reusability is possible. Also, you can do universal testing easily on the domain state. (Domain State: Server-Side Application State).
Redux: A single store is used in Redux to store an application that further makes debugging easier. Moreover, here, the state is immutable, and the previous state is saved towards each new state, hence time travel is possible here.
Conclusion: Depends on the requirement.
The Primary Comparison Is Discussed Below:
The basis of comparison
MobX
Redux
Basic Details
MobX is a testing library that follows TFRP to create simple state management
To manage the application state Redux follows JavaScript Library
Code
MobX is based on JavaScript
Originally, Redux is based on ES6
Founder/Developer
Michel Weststrate is behind the development of MobX
Dan Abramov and Andrew Clark are behind the development of Redux
Storage Capacity
Multiple data storage locations are available in MobX
One large space for data storage is available in Redux
Application Development
MobX supports well small-scale application
For complex applications, one should use Redux.
Performance
Delivers great performance
Efficiency is not as expected
Now, which is better between MobX Vs. Redux:
In this world, nothing can fit all the sizes, and the same goes here. Selecting any of the state management systems will depend on the developer’s call because he knows the requirement in actuality. Pros and cons are everywhere.
We have shared the difference between Redux and MobX to keep you aware of both concepts. Now, we need to analyze the requirement and then go for the technology as the ultimate aim is quality execution.
We at Linearloop have expertise in both technologies and have delivered lots of projects successfully across the world. Our team analyses the requirement first and then chooses the required library to start the project. So hire software development service from Linearloop and take your project to the next level.
Ready to discuss your project and find the optimal solution?
Mayank Patel
CEO
Mayank Patel is an accomplished software engineer and entrepreneur with over 10 years of experience in the industry. He holds a B.Tech in Computer Engineering, earned in 2013.
Analyze the requirement thoroughly and get the best match for the project.
Now coming back to the point, whether React is better or Angular? The document has a detailed discussion about React Vs Angular.
If we talk about the present scenario, React is more used rather than Angular. Additionally, approximately 35% of the developers prefer to work on React whereas 25% choose Angular. The data clearly shows the love for React as compare to Angular.
Founder of React and Angular JS:
Furthermore, if we go to their historic background, Google is the founder of Angular JS and it came into existence in the year 2016. And React is maintained and created by Facebook which was released in the year 2013.
Also, from the technical aspect, React JS is a library that helps to build a solid interface whereas Angular JS is a framework. React JS works on the concept of JSX which means JavaScript XML.
Those who are from technical background must be aware of these terms. Actually, JSX is a way through which HTML is written into JavaScript.
So guys, this article, is based on the comparison between two evolving programming concepts of Information Technology. We will discuss their significance on various parameters and draw a final conclusion.
If you are also willing to get associated with this topic, read out the entire content and share your views.
The Generic Differences along with data analysis
In this section, we are highlighting the generic differences between both the technical concepts.
It will help technocrats to understand the two programming approach from ground level. This section will enable you to understand the generic difference between Angular JS and React JS.
Foundation: Misko Hevery is the founder of Angular JS and Jordan Walke is the founder of React JS.
Idea Approach of both the technologies:
Angular JS is always useful if you are planning for an interactive and highly active web application. Additionally, If your web application is large in size and has frequently variable data, React JS will be the right option.
Data Binding:
The Data Binding approach of Angular JS is Two-Way whereas React JS is One-Way.
Framework Architecture:
React JS is a JavaScript library with View mode only. On the other side, Angular JS is a dedicated and comprehensive framework with having MVC structure.
Additionally, the presence of MVC, allows it to work on the front end as well as end-to-end development of a web application. When you are using Angular JS, there is no need to depend on 3rd parties because it offers more features and eliminates their need.
If we talk about the orientation of React JS, it needs a cross-platform development framework that is React Native. The amazing thing about React JS, it offers a library through which developers can create dynamic user interfaces.
Data Object Model (DOM) & Data Binding:
Actually both approaches are helpful in building large-scale and enterprise-level applications. Only there is a difference in their concept of DOM and Data Binding.
Angular JS works on the real DOM whereas React JS works on the virtual DOM. Under this element, React JS scores more because Angular JS becomes slower here.
It happens because Angular JS works on real DOM and it rewrites the entire HTML even when there is a small change request. On the other hand, React JS works on virtual DOM and developers are free to execute the update without rewriting the HTML.
Comparison of various elements
Performance:
Linearloop is one of the growing front-end web development company and we are saying this from our decades of experience. Performance is the primary concern for a developer prior to going for any specific technology.
Also, quality is the key component that one should maintain during development as well. Also, the activity strengthens the product and makes it more reliable.
As we have mentioned above that Angular JS works on real DOM while React JS is on virtual. The virtual DOM keeps the process of development fast because there is no need to rewrite the whole HTML code for a small change.
This is the reason; the developer selects React JS above Angular JS because it helps them do quick development and execution.
Flexibility:
The flexibility of any web application matters the most. In order to offer quality services, the development team always goes for a flexible solution. There is a considerable difference between the flexibility of both concepts.
If we talk about React JS, it offers variety to the developers in terms of tools, architecture, and libraries. Based on the requirement of the project, developers are free to do the required customization using the elements of React JS.
Now, if we go for Angular JS, it is not flexible like React JS. It is so because the developers can use components of Angular within other frameworks only. Also, its code must be embedded in an HTML application.
However, the presence of the feature limits the applications that need real-time updations. Also, there is one amazing thing about Angular JS, that it has a lifecycle in each component, and its name is Angular lifecycle
Scalability:
If we talk about scalability and compare both the solutions, it will be a little bit hard to call any of the best over the other. Also, both of them have their own significance that makes them reliable and robust.
The developer will have to select any of the technologies based on the project’s requirement. The aim should be to make the end product scalable and reliable.
Like Angular, React JS also works on Typescript and we have concrete knowledge of the concept. Additionally, no one can catch Linearloop when it comes to React Web Development.
Furthermore, being a known React Company, we know, React JS makes the product more scalable because it works on virtual DOM.
If we talk about Linearloop, we have successfully delivered many React JS projects using Typescript. Our expertise in technology has made us a reliable React JS company across the globe.
Market Share:
As we know, both technologies are introduced by the legends of the marketplace. Certainly, they have not created it only for sake of the developing world but they prefer to use them, for their own web applications.
Whether you are aware or not, Facebook and its related products such as Whatsapp and Instagram, work on React JS whereas Angular JS manages various Google services.
If we come out of the founder companies, there are millions of giants that use either React JS or Angular JS.
For example, Netflix, Uber, DropBox, AirPNB work on React JS whereas Upwork, Nike, Microsoft, HBO, Forbes, and Sony work on the concept of Angular JS.
What Market says
As per the data analysis, the market share that React JS holds is 0.4% whereas Angular JS holds 0.5%. Hence, both the concepts are making good contributions in the world of technologies and the economy as well.
Selecting any of them will be purely dependent on the real demand of the project. Linearloop works on Angular web development as well as React web development. Feel free to join us to develop your dream project.
UI components:
Whenever team plans for the development of a project, its UI becomes the most important part of it. Also, the UI elements should be interactive enough to attract users.
This is the base where your clients fall, and hence it must be appealing, easy, and innovative. On technical grounds, various components are involved in UI either you are working using React JS or Angular JS. Based on the request the UI performs.
If you use the right component corresponding to the demand of the project, it makes the entire project interactive.
UI Components of Angular JS
If we discuss the UI components of Angular JS, these are “Derivatives”. These derivatives enable Angular to track and attach the required behavior.
Also, the derivatives are the markers on DOM. Hence, UI components are separated as HTML tags and the concept makes it different.
UI Components of React JS
Further, in the case of React JS, the UI and component behavior are combined. It means the same code will be responsible for the creation of elements of Interface and behavior.
Hence, we have seen the contradiction between the UI components of both concepts. If you are willing to use Angular, it will offer a built-in toolbox. The toolbox will have layouts, indicators, pop-ups, etc.
On contrary, if your application demands React JS, it will offer easy and quick optimization of the UI. You can get either free or paid tools from their platform depending upon the need of the project.
Highlights of React and Angular
Why should you go for Angular JS (Use Cases):
If your application needs independent events handling and exchange of data, go for Angular JS. It has inbuilt features of Rxjs and AngularCLI that execute the demand quickly.
Angular JS optimizes the effort of development because it saves the code along with running the components.
It comes with a detailed framework with two way of binding
It offers support for TypeScript
Works on MVC architecture.
Why should you go for React JS (Use Cases):
This is a lightweight technology and very easy to learn.
React JS is fast because it works on Virtual DOM and rendering optimization
Proper support is available for PWA and SSR.
The components of React JS make it flexible and reliable because it works on reusability. It also makes the management of complex infrastructure easier.
React comes with One way data binding, which helps a lot in debugging.
Quick View React JS Vs Angular JS
Criteria
React
Angular
Release of Product
2013
2016
Founded By
Facebook
Google
Solution Type
Library
Framework
Language
JavaScript + TypeScript
TypeScript
DOM
Virtual
Regular
Architecture
Component-Based
Component-Based
Compatibility
Full Backward Compatibility
Need to install updates
Data Binding
One-Way
Two-Way
How is Linearloop your perfect choice?
Linearloop is the leading front-end web development company of the era. Our front-end development services include Angular web development and React web development.
Also, the consistent effort has given us recognition of progressive front-end Development companies. Furthermore at Linearloop, we have dynamic talents who even go beyond the limits in order to meet the requirement of the project.
Also, you have read a comparison between React JS Vs Angular JS, but we have expertise in both technologies. Hence whatever technology you need for your project, we are at our toes to work for you.
Final Conclusion
Hope you understood the difference between React Vs Angular. Furthermore, technologies are driving the present era. We are an established IT company and very well aware of the leading web solutions.
At the same time, we would also like to share that each technology has its own identity and benefit for the project. Great brains are behind the specific programming concepts.
It must have its own worth and virtue. Selecting any technology should be based on the requirement and expectations of the client. One should consider the ability of the development company as well.
AVIF Support: Next.js 12 is preferable for 20% small images.
Bot-aware ISR Fallback: The dynamic features of Next.js includes SEO optimization for web crawlers.
Support for Native ES Module: Here you will get an aligned standard module system.
URL Imports: The alpha version allows you to import packages from any anonymous URL and you are not required to install them.
React Server Components: You will get all the react server components with SSR streaming as well.
Rust Compiler is introduced for faster builds and quick refresh
As we know technologies are upgraded to make an application more appealing, productive, and interactive. Hence, Next.js 12 has incorporated the Rust compiler that makes executions by leveraging the benefits of native compilation.
The Rust compiler of Next.js 12 is developed on SWC. For those who are unaware of SWC, it is an open-source for the next generation of fast tooling. With this combination, Next.js delivers 3 times faster refresh and 5 times faster build.
Being a developer, this is the most attractive feature because it makes the process of development sorted, effortless, and result-oriented.
Some other attractive features of this dynamic release are:
Improved speed for bigger databases: The Next.js team has validated the Rust compiler against some largest codebases across the world. In this practical implementation, improved speed is monitored.
Improvised performance: The current release of Next.js that is Next.js 12 now delivers Fast Refresh timing in the console for both the parties (client & server). Further, it also includes the number of files and modules compiled.
Improvements in Webpack: Next.js 12 has brought improvisations to the webpack as well. Further, it makes the on-demand entries more reliable by maintaining the Fast Refresh.
Replacement of Babel with SWC
As stated, earlier Next.js 12 has utilized the features of Rust-based complier SWC in place of Babel in order to execute JavaScript or TypeScript. Moreover, with the version, the developers get full support for the applications having custom Babel configuration.
So, no need to worry about the compilation because Next.JS 12 comes with complete compatibility.
Additionally, the by default transformations like tree-shaking of getStaticProps / getStaticPaths / getServerSideProps and styled-jsx is now shifted to Rust.
The amazing thing about Next.js 12, it offers quick implementation of SWC for an application developed using Babel configuration. It means, no matter even if the application is developed using Babel, the new version automatically compiles JavaScript or Typescript through SWC.
Also, the compilation is done as per the same method of Next.js 11. The concept has sorted the compatibility issues from one version to another.
Replacement of Terser with SWC
To minify the JavaScript with 7 times faster execution, developers can select SWC over Terser. The required flag in next.config.js is:
With Middleware, the developer becomes able to use code over configuration. As Next.js has introduced Middleware, hence here you will get the flexibility to run the code prior to the completion of the request.
Further, the modification can be made by, redirecting, rewriting, adding headers, or even streaming HTML based on the response from the user.
Middleware is useful for the features that contain logic. These features are like
Authentication
Bot protection
Redirects and rewrites
Handling unsupported browsers
Feature flags and A/B tests
Server-side analytics
Advanced i18n routing requirements
Logging and many more
Furthermore, Middleware follows defined runtime and it supports APIs like fetch. Also, it works exceptionally well by using the next start. Further, it efficiently works for Edge platforms such as Vercel that uses Edge functions.
If you are looking to use Middleware in Next.JS, follow the given code after creating a file pages/_middleware.js
// pages/_middleware.js
export function middleware(req, ev) {
return new Response('Hello, world!')
}
Improved Styled-jsx CSS parsing
The implementation of the new CSS parser is made by following the old one. As we know, the parser executes the styled-jsx Babel transform. The handling of CSS is now easy in Next.js 12.
It also reflects an error for invalid CSS that is not the case in the older version, and it reflected unexpected behavior. The improved version throws all the errors during development only. Also, only styled-jsx is affected by the change.
Improvements with React 18
As we have mentioned in our blog “the new features of React 18”, that this version will come up with the features of Automatic Batching, APIs such as “startTransition”, Suspense, etc., so the Next.js team is closely working with the team of Facebook’s React 18 to make it compatible with all the new updates of React 18.
No further support for Webpack 4
Developers engaged with Webpack 5, do not need to go through this. The section is useful for those who are working using Webpack 4.
Being a Next.js developer, you must know, Next.js works using webpack 5 for all the compilations in the version Next.js 11. Hence in the new upgraded version Next.js 12, there is no support available for webpack 4.
If your project is developed with webpack 4, now you will get an error there. So, we recommend revising the code accordingly and avoiding unnecessary errors.
Support for ES Modules
Next.js 12 has support for ES modules that addons a standardized and professional module system to JavaScript. All major browsers including Node.js support it.
The concept offers a better user experience because it pushes the web ecosystem by enabling Java script bundles and smaller size packages both. Further, their support is available for developers, when the JavaScript ecosystem changes from common JS to ES module.
Support for URL imports
With the implementation of Next.js 12, developers are free to ES modules from any URL, without having any separate build or installation process. Through this feature, the technical team gets the flexibility to use any package straight from the URL.
As a result, Next.js 12 executes HTTP(S) remotely same as local dependencies.
To use the feature, follow the code by allowing URL prefixes in next.config.js:
Web Crawler or search bots in Next.js 12 automatically server-render the ISR pages by using the code “fallback: true”. Further, it also maintains the older behavior of the fallback state to non-crawler agents.
Because of this, crawlers are prevented from indexing loading states.
Smaller Images through AVIF
With the new update of Next.js, now there is no need to wait for the images that take longer than the expected time to optimize. As compared to WebP, here you will have 20% smaller images that further ease the optimization process.
Some other improvisations of Next.js 12:
The addition of pages like /_app.js or pages/_document.js to the application will replace the built-in version automatically even without the need for a reboot of the Next.js CLI.
Setting a custom tsconfig.json path is now supported by Next.js 12.
Using the shared worker pool, the static pages can be checked.
The concept uses WebSocket connection in place of EventSource connection.
Bot-Aware ISR Fallback
Web Crawler or search bots in Next.js 12 automatically server-render the ISR pages by using the code “fallback: true”. Further, it also maintains the older behavior of the fallback state to non-crawler agents.
Because of this, crawlers are prevented from indexing loading states.
Conclusion
So, guys, these are the changes done in the new version of Next.js. Further, Linearloop is one of the recognized software development company in usa, and hence we make sure to keep spreading awareness about the technology upgrade.
The announcement is made a few hours ago only, and we are here with all the details. If you need any kind of assistance, feel free to get in touch. Our team will explain in the best possible way.
Being in the industries for more than a decade, we have realized, developers give preference to the technology from where they can get easy and result-driven functionalities. And nothing came better than JavaScript.
Do you know why are we emphasizing JavaScript? Today, two dynamic frameworks React and Vue.js will be compared in order to check which one of them is best.
Our experience says, each technology has its own significance and its selection is dependent upon the requirement.
Here, we will cover React.js vs Vue.js based on certain parameters. So, developers can refer to these parameters while making a selection between React & Vue.
Further, always understand the project’s demand thoroughly and then select the required technology.
Being an experienced & best web development company in India, we always recommend choosing technology based on the client’s expectation and requirement of the project.
We have seen many cases where developers don’t bother about the project’s requirement and simply choose any of the frameworks. Later on, they regret their choice that leads the development in the wrong direction. Hence always go smart.
What is React.js?
Facebook has introduced the concept in the year 2013. Basically, React is a JS-based library and a widely used framework for project development. The market share of React is 2.9%. Further, developers can build complex UI using React.js
React offers flexibility to the developments. And to communicate with HTML documents it used virtual DOM. Also, the speed of development is fast because of one-way data binding.
We have delivered lots of React.js projects, & known as a preferred React.js development company in India & USA.
So if you are looking to develop a dynamic application hire React.js developers in India now and give a direction to your idea.
What is Vue.js?
Evan You has developed Vue.js in the year 2014. If you want to develop any lightweight or single-page application, Vue.js is the preferred option. The market share of Vue.js is 0.7% which is comparatively lower than React.
Vue.js works using virtual DOM and provides two-way data binding. Because of versatile features, developers become able to build their projects efficiently. Our Vue.js developers have efficiently executed countless projects across the world.
Because of our quality delivery and consistent approach, we are entitled as the foremost Vue.js development company in India.
Difference between Vue.js and React.js
There are significant differences in Vue vs React performance and other parameters. We will monitor all these parameters one by one and draw a conclusion on which JavaScript frame is best.
Working Approach:
React works using JSX and provides DOM manipulations. It also facilitates components and component state management because of which experienced developers prefer working with React. New developers may ignore the framework to work.
On the other hand, Vue.js works using HTML templates along with JSX. The concept increases the pace of development but sometimes creates complications.
Performance:
If we compare the performance of React and Vue, the speed of Vue is a bit faster than React. Developers can operate Vue at 80 KB and React at 100 KB.
Further, the difference is not that significant because both of them use DOM and hence their performance is almost equal.
Hence if performance is your key parameter, you can choose any of them because there is no noticeable difference in the performance. There is no clear winner on the basis of speed and performance. Considering the requirement document, developers should make their decision.
Community Support:
Community support is one of the considerable factors that determine the selection of the framework. Vue.js and React.js, both offer great community support. Developers get complete assistance during development.
However, as we have stated above, Facebook has developed React and its community is too large. Further, many leading tools are maintained by React community.
As far as Vue.js is concerned, the framework is new as compared to React. Evan You has developed Vue and he has not that much solid backup in terms of community range.
Although the technology is getting famous and popular and it will take time to reach the level of React.
So, when community support comes, React wins because of its massive size.
Size:
The size of an application matters a lot because the speed is dependent on the load. If the application is heavier, obviously its speed will be compromised and we never prefer the same. Hence, we will analyze React Vs. Vue in terms of size.
Sometimes, React needs third-party libraries to incorporate new features. As a result, the overall speed of the application becomes a little bit slower.
However, Vue.js has numerous in-built functions and they do not need any third-party help. Hence the speed of the Vue.js application is faster as compared to React.js
So, when size is the parameter, Vue.js wins.
Learning Curve:
How fast developers can understand the technology comes under the learning curve. Developers prefer technology that is easy to understand because updates are the integrated part of any framework.
Developers find React a little bit difficult because it is dependent on a third party. The documentation is available for all the implementation and new developers find it a bit challenging.
Vue.js counters all the problems faced by the developers and provides a user-friendly environment to execute the projects. Further, they have proper solutions to clear the doubts of the developers.
So, based on the learning curve comparison, Vue.js is the winner.
Desktop & Mobile Development:
React Native supports the development of mobile applications for Android and iOS. Also, the option is always preferred to develop cross-platform applications because it saves time, cost, and effort.
On the other hand, Vue.js is associated with Weex which is still in the development phase. It supports cross-platform UI frameworks like React. Being in the development the concept needs more testing to get complete assurance.
In terms of desktop & mobile applications, React.js is the winner.
Conclusion
We have mentioned the difference between Vue.js and React.js in the most significant way. Developers can select any of the two depending on their needs.
Our extensive range of services includes Vue.js and React.js development services in India & USA.
Further, you can hire a Vue.js developer or React.js developer from Linearloop as we are a leading Web Development Company in USA. Our development cost is competitive as per the market standards.
Try our JavaScript-based services and experience the difference. If you have any queries, feel free to connect.